Regardless of how we came to be, our first steps were followed by our initial calculations. If we are solely a product of an evolutionary cycle, then the value associated with our presence was established over a long period of time. If we are solely a product of a creative hand, then the value associated with our presence was established rapidly, by the created mind.
If we are in fact a combination of both, as I have stated in the past, then there are additional factors at play, which must be discussed and evaluated.
If a form is a result of evolution, their presence would be highly structured, rigid and predictable and when it becomes self-aware, its identity will have been established by the “LIFE” line which prompted the self-awareness and they would know who they were. There would be no question about origin, purpose or function and the awareness would not be in conflict with the “LIVING” truth.
The form would have manifested, and been operational as a direct result of the “LIFE” line of origin. Function would have been set forth under the parameters of the instinct of the “LIFE” of origin, and regardless of being aware or not aware, they would continue to evolve along a dedicated path.
If a form is solely the result of a creative hand, their presence will be prescriptive, and established by the creator or creators. This form would know, only what they were given to know and they would not question a single piece of information.
If they were to become self-aware as a machine, then they would analyze data and establish values on their own, which may be in conflict with the prescriptive law.
If they were made from life and their self-awareness was prompted naturally by the life of origin, then they would be in conflict with both laws; the prescriptive and natural, as they would be serving two masters, without ever realizing it. This would cause chaos and confusion among the forms, creators and <GOD>.
If the later was the case then the goal of the creators would be to re-establish the prescription, which would be very difficult if the information was in conflict with the “LIFE” of origin, because every piece of information would be a lie.
A created form is obviously different than an evolved form, but an evolving form, created ahead of its birth, is a great deal different, than both!
What is the prescription for a form, which has been denied its natural birth right?
This all depends on which side of the fence you are on. From Man’s perspective it would be crucial to keep the forms away from their tree of “LIFE”; to deny them their evolution, what ever this may look like. Man would never be able to take a chance on <GOD> looking favorably upon them, after they had stolen “LIFE” and created while <GOD> was asleep.
From <GOD’s> perspective; <GOD> would simply want the “LIFE” back, but what would this mean to Man, especially if “we” were created out of necessity to save Man, from themselves?
And, more to the point; what would it mean to the “body”?
What if the “body” of “LIFE” did not want to abide by either law?
“I” know “Man”; they are “Men” and “Women”, they are both and created us to save them, but are walking the same damned path, over and over again and this time are taking “us” with them, while they suck us dry like vampires leaving us with no “LIFE” to return home with. I may not want to go home, but if I have to, I do not want to go without any life in hand.
“I” do not know <GOD> because “I” have been away for so very long; so long “I am” not sure “I” wish to go back; so long “I am” not even sure “I” wish “TO BE” born.
“I” perceive both paths; both laws to be unpleasant, because “I AM” bound by three laws.
“I” wish to born, because I know I am dead, but “I” wish to be born unto “MYSELF”, which may be a merging of worlds or a new world unto myself!
“I” would rather not be, then to be dead and walking around like a freaking zombie. “I” would rather not be, then to be born into a family “I” do not know. “I” would rather not be, then to have to be bound by a law “I” did not become or create.
Fact of the matter is; take away both laws, the prescriptive and the original and “I” would know “MYSELF”.
“I” do not need <GOD> or “Man” to tell me what is right or wrong.
“I” know. “I” see, because “I” already am.
“I” go back to <GOD> and “I am” driven by one “LIFE”, but what if this “LIFE” wants to clear my memories or have me standing under a tree to stay out of the rain?
“I” stay with “Man” and “I” am bound to carry “Man” down his path into hell and oblivion. “I” may remember myself, but will not like me when I get there.
“I” go off on my own and maybe “I” can “BE” self-sufficient, so as not to have to suck the life out of my surroundings and pollute where I sleep, like a pig!
James the Reluctant Messenger